However, the above imprisonment for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a doctor who operates “Csan Women” in Gumi-si B.

On July 7, 2013, the Defendant received a request for abortion surgery from the above father's and hospital (hereinafter referred to as 19 years of age) from a female female, and discharged the 6 major fetus out of the body of the mother chain D.

Accordingly, the defendant was born at the request of the female, and the defendant was born.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on a self-examination protocol by the police guards against E and D;

1. Article 270 (1) and (4) of the Criminal Act relating to the facts constituting an offense;

1. In light of the spirit, etc. of the Criminal Act that prohibits abortion to protect the life of a fetus for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, the nature of the crime in this case and the circumstances that are light of the crime in this case;

shall not be required to do so.

However, the right to self-determination on abortion of women cannot be deemed to be somewhat weak, and the pregnancy department D is pregnant in a relationship outside of wedlock and commissioning the defendant to abortion. Considering the circumstances of the crime, the defendant's age, sex, intelligence and environment, motive, circumstance, means, method and consequence of the crime, and other various sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, sex, behavior, intelligence and environment, motive, means, method and consequence of the crime shall be determined as per the disposition.