A. The lower court’s sentencing is too inappropriate.

B. The lower court’s sentencing is too uncomfortable.

2. In light of the fact that the Defendant again committed the instant crime during the period of repeated crime even though he/she had committed the same criminal record at several times, and that the nature of the instant crime is not good, strict punishment against the Defendant is required.

However, considering the following factors: (a) the Defendant divided his mistake; (b) the Defendant agreed with the victim C, E, and F; (c) the Defendant’s health is not good; and (d) the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct and environment; (b) the motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentence imposed by the lower court is deemed appropriate; and (d) the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s above assertion are too heavy or unreasonable. Therefore, the Defendant and the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion are without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.