When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant, who operates a cream room in Geumcheon-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, was requested by the operators of commercial sex acts establishments to take protogram photographs against female sex trafficking women to be used in the advertisement of commercial sex acts, and accepted them.

On January 1, 2013, upon receipt of a request from Nonindicted Party C who operates a sexual traffic business establishment to take photographs to be used for advertising female sexual traffic, the Defendant taken pictures of the female sexual traffic business operator in his name, and delivered them to C using a computer program in the above scam, and then received 200,000 won in consideration of the consideration. From that time to November 15, 2013, the Defendant taken pictures of the advertising pictures for 253 times in total at the request of the owners of sexual traffic business, and aided and abetted the act of advertising the business operator to conduct sexual traffic or arrangement of sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Entry into the protocol of seizure;

1. Each description of an investigation report (a photograph of a DNA computer storage log), search and seizure warrant execution result (transaction details, etc.), investigation report (a list of business places depositing into the suspect's account), investigation report (a list of business places depositing into the suspect's account), investigation report (a list of criminal offenders attached to the sexual traffic business places), investigation report (a list of criminal offenders attached to the passbook), details of transactions, digital evidence analysis report, investigation report (a list of copies of the passbook), and investigation report

1. The provisions of each of the statutes governing the conversation, the advertisement pictures of sexual traffic establishments, seized articles, etc., and the application of such statutes;

1. Article 20 (1) 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 32 of the Criminal Act;

1. The Defendant who selected the selective fine of punishment is the primary offender, and all profits from the crime of this case are collected. In light of the mode of the crime of this case, it is in balance with the sentencing of the crime of Article 20(2) of the above Act punishing the production, supply, and publication of advertisements to sexual traffic establishments, etc.