2. The costs of lawsuit shall be determined by the first and second instances.

It is difficult to grasp the overall purport of the primary and primary causes of the instant claim. However, the Plaintiff’s collusion with the Plaintiff and the Selection G (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) to seek damages as stated in the claim in the primary and primary grounds of claim against the Defendants on the grounds that the Defendants caused damages to the Plaintiff and the Selection G (hereinafter “Plaintiff, etc.”) or caused illegal conditions, and as such, sought reimbursement of damages as stated in the claim in the primary and primary

On the other hand, the Plaintiff’s claim for payment of money and the Plaintiff’s claim for return of goods cannot be seen as a legitimate claim for litigation because there is no appropriate statement about the cause of the claim (including delay damages) such as the basis for calculation of the amount for which the claim is sought.

In addition, it is difficult to specify the subject matter of a lawsuit only with the purport of the claim, and even if the fact of tort committed by Defendant C and D, such as the Plaintiff’s assertion, it is difficult to deem that the above Defendants have the obligation to state the claim immediately, and as such, it cannot be found that the general title clause that allows the above Defendants to bear such obligation under the current law cannot be seen as a legal claim.

Therefore, the plaintiff's primary and conjunctive claims are all unlawful.

(B) The Plaintiff’s assertion is not proved with the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff, even if it is possible to decide on the merits of this case. If so, the instant lawsuit, which was changed in exchange in the trial, is unlawful, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.