When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 15:00 on September 10, 2017, the Defendant paid KRW 700,000 per day to the Defendant’s bank account and returned the said card three days after lending the check to the Defendant’s bank account. In response to the proposal of a person under his name, the Defendant sent a copy of the physical card connected to the post bank account (F) in the name of the Defendant to the Nonindicted Party and sent the password to the Nonindicted Party on his own, and notified the Kakao Stockholm Stockholm.

Accordingly, the defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the approaching media.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of the G production;

1. Details of deposits and application of Acts and subordinate statutes on response to data;

1. Article 49 of the Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense, Article 49 of the Act on Electronic Financial Transactions through which punishment is selected, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and Article 6 (3) 2 of the same Act, and selection of fines;

1. The crime of lending an access medium under the Electronic Financial Transactions Act for the reason of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act with the custody of the workhouses is a means to facilitate other crimes committed against many unspecified persons, such as Bosing, etc. The fact that the physical card offered by the Defendant was actually used for the crime of Bosing, the Defendant’s mistake is against the Defendant, and the first offender is considered.