except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 26, 2014, at around 03:00 on the front side of Pyeongtaek-si B, the Defendant: (a) stated that D, who was dispatched by the Defendant after receiving a report of 112 that the Defendant was in front of the taxi driver and destination issue, would restrain himself/herself; and (b) assaulted D, who was in front of the instant ice D’s flaps, flading the flaps.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although the liability of a criminal defendant who has used violence to a police officer with the reason for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act is not minor, a suspended sentence shall be sentenced as ordered by the court in consideration of the fact that the criminal defendant is recognized to commit a crime, that the criminal does not have any force concerning violence, that there is no force over fines and that there is no force over fines and the age of the defendant