However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 13, 2018, the Defendant driven a 22:47 km car in the name of the Defendant in the name of 4 km from the jun-gu-gu-gu-si-gu-si-si-si-si-dong-gu-gu-si-gu-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-si-dong-si-si-si, where the trade name on the emulbial distance is unknown, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.2:47% of alcohol content during blood.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A traffic accident report;

1. An accident scene photograph;

1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. The provision of Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the selection of punishment for a crime under the relevant Act;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the order to provide community service and attend lectures was that the Defendant, despite having been punished for drinking driving, was engaged in driving at the same time in the state of drinking.

However, the punishment of a single fine was fully imposed, and the defendant does not commit a second offense.

The punishment shall be determined as per the order, taking into account the fact that it is being taken.