부당해고구제재심판정취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff, including the part arising from the supplementary participation.
1. The decision of the court of first instance that the dismissal of the intervenor in this case against the intervenor cannot be deemed as a serious defect in the disciplinary procedure, and the decision of the court of first instance that the dismissal of the intervenor in this case is legitimate on the ground that the grounds for the disciplinary action are recognized, and there is no abuse of the authority to exercise disciplinary discretion, even if the plaintiff re-examines the plaintiff's assertion based on the evidence submitted in the court of first instance and the trial.
Therefore, this court's reasoning is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this court's reasoning is acceptable in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.