위증
The defendant shall be innocent.
1. On March 12, 2009, the Defendant testified that “In the case of perjury with respect to a criminal case, such as fraud against Suwon District Court Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch Branch, the Defendant took an oath to be punished for perjury, and how the agreement would have been completed by September 30, 2006,” and “I would like to do so, but will clearly be completed by September 30, 2006 until September 30, 2006.” The Defendant testified that “I would like to do so,” and “I would like to do so at least 53 million won until September 30, 2006,” and “I would like to pay 3.5 million won to the defense counsel’s question that “I will have paid the development agreement at any time,” and the remaining 4.5 million won will be paid to C’s defense counsel until September 30, 2006.”
The testimony was made as ‘the testimony'.
However, pursuant to the agreement on development of forest land 760 square meters, such as Gwangju-si D, which was concluded on July 7, 2006, the Defendant immediately before July 3, 2006, and KRW 24 million on the date of the above development agreement, and the same year.
9. 28.10 million won was transferred to the appellant as development costs, including the transfer of 12 million won on November 21, 201 of the same year, and 50 million won on January 5, 2007 to the account designated by C, and only 40 million won until September 30, 2006, and 52 million won was paid until December 31, 2006.
Accordingly, the defendant raised a perjury against his memory.
2. According to the records, when the defendant testified at the above court, he paid C the development agreement cost of KRW 6 million on July 3, 2006, KRW 24 million on July 7, 2006, KRW 10 million on September 28, 2006, KRW 12 million on November 21, 2006, KRW 5 million on January 5, 2007, and paid 40 million until September 30, 2006, KRW 52 million on December 31, 2006.