However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From April 29, 2014 to December 15, 2010 of the same year, the Defendant: (a) connected to the Internet gambling site by using 15 ID in his/her own and its name, such as “B; and (b) connected to the overseas gambling site; and (c) returned the said “C’s account under the name of G (post offices, H), I (National Bank, J); (c) the account under the name of the Bank of Bank (National Bank, L); (d) the account under the name of the Bank of Finance (National Bank, L); and (e) the account under the name of the Bank of Korea (National Bank, National Bank, and N) deposited KRW 631,90,000 at one time, and returned the same amount of betting to 90,000,000 won and 9,000,0000 won and 9,000,000 won and 9,000,000 won and 9,000.

Accordingly, the defendant habitually stuffed the defendant.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each investigation report and accompanying documents;

1. Habituality of judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes recognizing dampness in light of the method of crime, frequency of crime and the fact that the same kind of crime has been committed in a planned number of times;

1. Article 246 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act (including habitual gambling, inclusive) concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the amount of gambling shall be large amount or the amount of gambling shall be considered to reflect the mistakes committed against the beginning offender);

1. It is decided as ordered by the reason that protection and observation, community service and lecture attendance order are more than 62-2 of the Criminal Act (in order to prevent recidivism);