2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant, who led to the instant crime, led to the confession and reflect of the instant crime, and the amount of damage is not significant.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant had been punished several times for the same crime of fraud; (b) the Defendant did not recover from the injury up to the trial; and (c) did not agree with the victim; and and (d) other circumstances that form the conditions for sentencing specified in the instant pleadings, such as the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable even if considering the favorable circumstances of the Defendant

C. Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.