When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On June 27, 2014, at around 09:20 on June 27, 2014, the Defendant: “Around 301, the Defendant: (a) discovered the circumstances of the instant case by the police box of the Sungdong Police Station C (37 years old) who was called the victim after receiving a report, and confirmed the circumstances of the instant case; and (b) took the Defendant’s bath to “this son and Neas he knows,” and took the Defendant’s desire to issue a penalty payment notice on the disturbance of drinking alcohol, the Defendant took the view that “I am this son and Neas he knows, and I am. I am about the right side of the horse D one time with the left hand.”

As a result, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers, and at the same time, the above victim was in a face-to-face room in need of medical treatment for about two weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts, and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 136 (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;