When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On August 15, 2014, at around 21:20, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the damage of property by sending the front door door of the victim C owned by the victim C, which was in the atmosphere of the signal signal in front of the same-sex film town, 941-ro, in front of the same-sex film town, without any justifiable reason; (b) destroyed the front door door door of the victim E-owned by the victim E, who was in the signal, with a string of the driver’s seat of the passenger car; and (c) destroyed the front door door door of the H EF store or other car owned by the victim G, which was in the signal atmosphere, by sending the front door door door of the victim’s HEF station or other car; and (d) destroyed by the front door door door door of the victim’s vehicle at the same place as at around 21:35 on the same day without any justifiable reason.

2. On August 15, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 21:40 on August 15, 2014, the obstruction of performance of official duties: (b) when L, who was called to the site after receiving a report of 112 on the street in front of the 941-ro Maddong Movie Station, confirmed the damage of property and the fact of assault to the Defendant; (c) the Defendant took a bath to the said L as “unch, Sick,” and moved to the center line of a road with a large number of traffic; (d) the said L safely takes the Defendant’s delivery until the delivery; and (d) assault the said L to the said L’s left part of the said L at four times on the hand, and continuously took the front part of the said L’s left part in the process of arresting the flagrant offender into a flagrant offender, and continuously saw the Defendant’s left part of the said L’s left part as a saw, and continuously embling the instant L’s left part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties in relation to police officers' relief and crime control.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police concerning L;

1. Each statement;

1. Written estimate;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 366 of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. That there is no special criminal record in addition to the fact that a mistake in the choice of punishment is divided, that there is an agreement with the victims of damage to property, and that there is no special criminal record.