손실보상금
1. The Defendant’s KRW 2,352,00 for the Plaintiff and 5% per annum from November 23, 2016 to November 27, 2017.
1. Circumstances and results of appraisal of the ruling;
(a) Business title - Public housing project (B) - Public housing project (hereinafter referred to as “instant project”): The public notice: C of October 5, 201, published by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs C - Project operator: Defendant
(b) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation made on September 29, 2016 - The date of expropriation: The date of November 22, 2016 - The Land Tribunal’s ruling of expropriation made on September 22, 2016 - The land subject to expropriation is 448§³ (hereinafter “instant land”) and its ground obstacles located in the instant project area: The land of this case 465,180,800 won, obstacles and KRW 123,291,190 - The Land Appraisal Corporation, the Pacific and the Korean Land Appraisal Corporation.
(c) The Central Land Tribunal’s ruling on an objection made on April 27, 2017 - Compensation: 507,382,400 won of the instant land, and 132,550,660 won of obstacles - An appraisal corporation: A new appraisal corporation in the future of a stock company, a stock company, and a substitute appraisal corporation for an appraisal corporation;
D. Results of appraiser E’s appraisal (hereinafter “ appraiser E” and “the result of the court appraisal”) - The result of the appraisal by the court: The land of this case 509,734,400 won [the grounds for recognition] is not disputed; each entry of Gap’s 1, 2, and Eul’s 1 through 3 (including each number number if any); the result of the appraiser E’s appraisal; the purport of the entire pleading;
2. Since the compensation determined by the plaintiff's objection ruling was excessively low and unfair, the defendant is obligated to pay the difference between the reasonable compensation for losses and the compensation for losses as determined by the plaintiff's objection ruling.
3. The judgment of this Court
A. The following facts are acknowledged if the purport of the entire argument is added to each of the above evidence:
1) The instant land is located on the north side of G located in the city of Overcheon-si, and farmland, forest land, housing, etc. are mixed around the north side of G located in the city of Overcheon-si, and the overall traffic conditions, such as farmland, forest land, housing, etc. are complicated, and it is difficult to access the vehicle and the bus stops are located in the vicinity. 2) The instant land is replaced by another.