분묘발굴등
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor of the gist of the grounds for appeal, the court below acquitted the defendant, although the defendant could sufficiently be found to have obtained the transfer of KRW 10,440,00 from the victim to the Korea Rural Community Corporation and the transfer of KRW 10,440,00 for compensation for the said grave and the grave removal equipment, etc., even though he is not a dmpson, even though he is not a dmpson, the defendant was not guilty. In so determining, the court below erred by misapprehending the facts or by misapprehending the legal principles, which affected the conclusion of the judgment.
2. The lower court, on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, did not sufficiently prove that the Defendant was not a pro rata, and that the Defendant knew or could have known that he was not a pro rata. In addition to the following circumstances acknowledged by the record, the lower court’s judgment appears to be justifiable, and there was no error of mistake of facts as claimed by the Prosecutor.
Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.
The N is presumed to have been made in the 1880s, which is the old year, and it is believed that there was no special reason to make a false NM at the time of its making. This is also true in view that the NM is almost written even in the 1957 satisfaction table.
In other words, according to the N, the N’s valley leads to the order of V, W, K, X, Y, Z, and AA, and even in 1957, the AB (CV), AC (W), E (W), AE (W), AF (WY), and AG (WY) are almost the same as the N’s previous report.
However, the 1957 Annexed as AH (AI) rather than N, unlike the N, in the 1957 Sheet, N is the AK (AA), which is the son of the AJ.