beta
(영문) 대전지방법원 2015.02.12 2014나103310

건물인도 등 청구

Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

3. The decision of the court of first instance is in accordance with paragraph 1.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows. Thus, the reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

[Attachment] Part 8 of the second part] The lease of the instant building was paid KRW 300,00 to the Plaintiff on December 15, 2010.

The second page "11,450,000" is "1,150,000".

The second sentence’s “10,800,000” is deemed to read “10,50,000”, “ December 15, 2010” is deemed to read “15, 201.15,” and “36 months” as “35 months,” respectively.

The second part of the 19th part of the 19th part of the 19th part is the "claim for Reimbursement of Expenses or Claim for Return of Unjust Enrichment."

The third place "building" of the third place is built as "building".

The “each entry in the evidence Nos. 3 through 5” in the 3rd 7th , is considered as “each entry or video of the evidence No. 2 in the evidence No. 3 through 5 and 7, which seems consistent with the Defendant’s assertion.”

Nos. 3 and 9 of Paragraph 9 of this case are "no," and, rather, considering the overall purport of the pleadings as to Gap's evidence 1, 2, 10, and 11, the testimony of witness E of the party concerned, and the fact inquiry into the president of the Saemaul Depository of the Daejeon District District of the Organization of the Republic of Korea and the president of the Daejeon District of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization, the Organization of the Organization of the Organization of the Organization.

The third party's 11,430,000 "B," respectively, shall be 11,150,000 "B," 10,800,000 "B, 10,500,000."

2. Conclusion