However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

On October 12, 2012, the Defendant knew that there are high-priced automobile parts, etc. in the maintenance factory, while working for the maintenance of a arche car in the Incheon Gyeyang-gu Motor Vehicle Maintenance Factory.

around 00:00 on October 13, 2012, the Defendant intruded into the factory through its open window, and subsequently carried out two parts and tools equivalent to three million won in total, including 300,000 won of the market value of the victim C, which was displayed in the factory, and 2 KON N9,000,000 won of the market value of the victim C, 30,000 won of the market value, 1.2 million won of the market value, and 5,00,000 won of the market value.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night, and stolen the object owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to C

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The market price of a stolen article is three million won or more, and the defendant agreed with the victim, and the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Act shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account the circumstances leading to the crime of this case, method of crime, criminal record relation, etc.