except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of C Freight.

On November 22, 2013, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle on November 18:30, 2013, and led to the U.S. U.S. U.S. to U.S. U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.S., U.

Since there are vehicles driving in the opposite lane without signal, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by accurately manipulating the front section and accurately manipulating the steering gear.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and caused the victim D(50 years of age) who was driving in the opposite lane due to negligence, to be able to receive the right side part of the said cargo in front of the E-to-be.

In the end, the Defendant caused the victim to have the victim suffer from pulmonal injury and cerebral cerebral cerebral tymosis in the same job by occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the law No. 1 to 8, and 10, the evidence list submitted by the prosecutor

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of alternative imprisonment without prison labor;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., the purchase of an automobile comprehensive insurance, the agreement with the victim’s bereaved family members, the age of 69 years old, and the fact that there is no criminal power after 1986, and the fact that the mistake is recognized and reflected, etc.).