교통사고처리특례법위반등
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The gist of the grounds for appeal is that the defendant reflects the error in depth, the defendant intends to sell the vehicle driven to another person to avoid driving any more, the defendant is under restraint by the instant crime, and is economically difficult circumstances such as dismissal from the company, and the defendant has agreed with the victims of traffic accidents, etc., the punishment (six months of imprisonment) imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.
2. Taking into account the circumstances alleged by the Defendant, even in the past, the case where the Defendant repeated drinking and unlicensed driving of this case (five times a fine and two times a suspended sentence of imprisonment) which had been punished several times due to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes), the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment), and the violation of the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.) and the Road Traffic Act (Aggravated Punishment, etc.), and the occurrence of injury to four victims as a result of the occurrence of the Defendant’s vehicle damaged by the Defendant’s driver’s vehicle. In light of the Defendant’s punishment history, the Defendant’s punishment alone seems to be difficult to expect the effect of the Defendant’s drinking and unlicensed driving, and it is necessary to strictly eradicate the Defendant’s life and property, and the Defendant’s other circumstances, including the character and conduct of the Defendant, the background and result of the instant crime, and the circumstances after the Defendant’s oral sentencing.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal of this case is without merit and it is in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.