야간건조물침입절도등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.
Seized evidence 1 shall be confiscated.
Punishment of the crime
On April 20, 2019, the Defendant entered C with a passage between the fence and the toilet around 22:36, 2019, and entered C with a single example period of 300,000 won owned by the victim D.
Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.
The Defendant of “2019 Man-Ma3013” demanded that the victim D (Inn, 55 years of age) reach an agreement on the night-time building intrusion theft case during trial as above, but the victim did not reach an agreement. However, there was no good appraisal against the victim of ordinary peace who did not reach an agreement.
1. On December 9, 2019: (a) around 04:29, the Defendant causing special property damage: (b) around December 9, 2019: (c) around 04:29, the Defendant destroyed property by means of breaking off the 50,00 won of the market price because the victim did not reach an agreement on the “F cafeteria” operated by the victim in Goungnam-gun E on December 9, 2019; (d) on the ground that the victim does not have reached an agreement on the night-time structure intrusion theft case in the trial pending, and the beer’s disease in the truck owned by the Defendant was laid on the front of the victim’s restaurant at the victim’s restaurant; and (e) destroyed the glass of the tree, which is a dangerous object on the street; and (e) continuously destroyed the property by breaking off the 3 master for publicity in the market price.
2. On December 9, 2019, around 08:22, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around December 9, 2019, caused special property damage, the victim did not reach an agreement on the night building intrusion theft case in which the trial is pending; (b) the victim reported his/her property to an investigative agency; and (c) the victim reported his/her property to the investigation agency; and (d) the victim was frightened to the victim.
On the same day, at around 08:22, the Defendant visited the victim’s restaurant with hacker (33 cm), which is a dangerous article in the truck owned by the Defendant, while possessing the hacker (33 cm). However, the victim did not have any hacker, and “hacker all of the glass.”
These weathers.