납부의무자확인
1. Between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, with respect to the operation of the automobiles indicated in the separate sheet from January 1, 2003.
According to Gap evidence Nos. 1 and 3, upon the defendant's request, the plaintiff lent the plaintiff's name at the time of purchasing the automobile, and the defendant purchased the automobile listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter "the automobile of this case") on Aug. 29, 2002 and registered in the plaintiff's name. The defendant promised to transfer the name of the automobile of this case to the plaintiff by December 31, 2002, but without transferring the registered name of the automobile of this case, it can be recognized that the fine for negligence and automobile tax occurred while operating the automobile of this case was not paid.
According to the above facts, the plaintiff and the defendant are liable to pay administrative fines and automobile taxes imposed in the name of the plaintiff in relation to the operation of the automobile of this case from January 1, 2003 to the defendant, and considering the whole purport of the arguments, the plaintiff's interest in confirmation is recognized (However, since res judicata of this lawsuit is effective only between the plaintiff and the defendant, and it does not affect the state or local governments, and the plaintiff's obligation to pay taxes, public charges, and administrative fines, etc. against the administrative agency which imposed the tax authority or the administrative fine is not extinguished). Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim of this case of this case is justified, and it