beta
(영문) 의정부지방법원 고양지원 2012.12.14 2012고정431

폭행

Text

The sentence of punishment against the Defendants shall be suspended separately.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are those operating the “D” of the married couple’s leutism.

1. At around 07:30 on October 2, 201, Defendant A: (a) expressed the victim G (at the end of 20 years of age) and the victim H (at the end of 20 years of age)’s “D” located immediately next to the Defendant’s operation of the Defendant at the Jungdong-gu E Building first floor; (b) expressed the victim G, who was in the “F,” who was in the “F,” and expressed his bath to “F,” stating that the victim G, who was in the “F, was satisfying to have no food satch; and (c) expressed that the victim G, who was in the “F, was satched to have satched to have satisfy; and (d) continuously assaulted the victim’s head h’s head by hand.

2. Defendant B, at the above date and place, heard the opinion that wife A was in contact with the victim G, followed the victim into “F”, and took the victim’s bath, breathing the victim’s breath in hand, and assaulted the victim by taking the victim’s head more than 2 to 3 times.

Summary of Evidence

1. The entry of any part of each protocol of examination of the police in G or H into such protocol;

1. Each part of the statements prepared G and H;

1. Application of the photographic Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Defendant B who choose a fine: Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of a fine;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendant A who is to suspend the sentence: Fine of 500,000 won: fine of 300,000 won;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act provides that Defendant A was subject to violence from victims and suffered considerable injury; Defendant B, the wife, knowing that Defendant A was subject to the assault from victims, caused the instant crime by contingently, and the extent of the assault inflicted by the Defendants is not much serious. This is followed after the crime.