beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.11.23 2016노3240

도로교통법위반(음주운전)

Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment) by the lower court (e., six months) is too unreasonable.

2. In light of the sentencing conditions stated in the records and arguments of the instant case, the lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable, even considering the circumstances alleged by the Defendant as the grounds for appeal.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

4. In accordance with Article 25(1) of the Regulations on Criminal Procedure, ex officio correction of the judgment of the court below shall be corrected by correcting the first to second to second to second to half of the written judgment of the court below as follows:

On July 19, 2012, the defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Southern District Court on July 19, 201; on April 11, 201, the Incheon District Court issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act; on January 30, 2009, the Seoul Western District Court was sentenced to a fine of KRW 2.5 million for a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.