가. 원고는 피고 소속 근로자로, 2011. 7. 5. 05:00경 서귀포시 B에 있는 C농공단지 내에서 D과 함께 인공어초형틀 해체작업을 하였는데, 위 해체작업 중 위 D이 굴삭기 붐대 끝에 걸려 있는 쇠사슬 고리를 원고에게 가까이 대어주는 과정에서 쇠사슬 고리가 인공어초형틀 어딘가에 걸렸다가 튕기면서 형틀위에서 볼트 해제 여부를 확인하고 있던 원고의 오른쪽 얼굴 부위를 충격하는 바람에 원고가 안구파열 등의 상해를 입는 사고가 발생하였다.

B. From July 5, 2011 to May 15, 2013, the Plaintiff received KRW 49,580,200 for medical care benefits and disability benefits 13,883,030 for the period of medical care, and received KRW 5,467,116 for medical expenses, etc. from the Defendant.

[Ground of recognition] Unsatisfy, partial testimony of witness D, Gap evidence Nos. 4, 12, 16, Eul evidence No. 3 (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Article 23(1)1 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act imposes an obligation on a business owner to take measures necessary to prevent hazards caused by machinery, apparatus, and other equipment.

In addition, an employer is an incidental duty under the good faith principle accompanying a labor contract and bears the duty to protect an employee by improving a physical environment so that the employee does not harm his/her life, body, or health in the course of providing his/her labor, and is liable to compensate the employee for damages caused by his/her breach of such duty.

According to the above facts, the defendant is obligated to thoroughly provide safety education to the plaintiff and D who perform the dismantling work of artificial fishing portraits as a business owner and to thoroughly supervise the work process and prevent accidents in accordance with safety rules, and the defendant is obligated to prevent accidents in advance.