When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[criminal power] On September 21, 2007, the defendant was issued a summary order of 700,000 won for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act in the support of the Daejeon District Court on September 21, 2007.

【Criminal Facts】

On January 4, 2020, at around 21:25, the Defendant driven a DNA car with approximately 6km alcohol concentration of about 0.047% from the 6km section to the front of the mutually influoral main office located in Pyeongtaek-si dead Bag-si B from the front of the road in Ansan-si B.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the Road Traffic Act prohibition provisions at least twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the statement of the state of drinking drivers, and inquiry into the results of drinking control;

1. Previouss before judgment: Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to criminal records, references to criminal records, amounts of dispositions and results of confirmation;

1. Relevant Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the provisional payment order is based on a comprehensive consideration of the following factors: (a) the developments leading up to the Defendant’s drunk driving, the criminal records of the Defendant’s same kind, the age, character, conduct and environment, etc.; and (b) the sentencing conditions under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in