When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant appears to have written indictment “D” as written indictment.

A person engaged in driving a gallon or car.

On April 9, 2014, at around 08:36, the Defendant proceeded ahead of the fixed line 1240 power pumps in the Jeongwon-gun, Gangwon-do, the Jeongwon-gun, to the first intersection of the fixed line.

Since there are reports on the side of the road and people's passage frequent, the driver of the motor vehicle has a duty of care to thoroughly operate the motor vehicle in front of the road and to prevent accidents due to the failure of the report by operating the motor vehicle along with the vehicle line.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not properly go beyond the center line and did not go beyond the opposite sidewalk due to the driving of a stroke, and the Defendant shocked the left side part of the victim E (the age 49) who was walking on the sidewalk, with the left part of the said car, and the victim F (the age 36) who was trying to avoid the said car, together with the said E, exceeded the floor.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence on duty, the injury to the pertinent E, such as climatic salt, etc. requiring approximately three weeks of medical treatment, and the injury to the pertinent F, such as the escape of a conical signboard requiring approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement to F and E;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of the occurrence report on traffic accident, the actual condition investigation report on traffic accident, and on-site photographs statutes;

1. Article 3 (1) of the relevant Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The degree of injury of victims on the grounds of sentencing in Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not focus on the provisional payment order, and there was an agreement with the victim E, and the vehicle of the defendant is covered by the comprehensive insurance.