A shall be punished by a fine of 10,00,000 won and by imprisonment of 1 year and 4 months, respectively.

Defendant

A The above fine shall be imposed.

As the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport announced the "Guidelines for the Selection of Housing Management Business Entities and Business Entities" in the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport in 201, the selection was made through bidding after the representative meeting of occupants was organized in the apartment complex.

An apartment management entity entrusted with apartment management (ju) that is well aware of such circumstances, the NM of the regular business affairs of the company affiliated with the apartment management company (the non-detained indictment of interference with bidding, etc. on March 16, 2015) promised to provide money and goods to the defendant B of the representative conference of occupants of the apartment apartment located in Yeonsu-gu Incheon, Incheon, to offer money and goods to the chairperson of the representative council of occupants of the apartment complex. On the other hand, the bidder P (the imprisonment of 10 months for the crime of interference with bidding and re-performance of breach of trust on March 28, 2015) who is a bidding hub,

In addition, the above P interference with Defendant A who wishes to operate a child care center through Q and R, and prepared a notice of the selection of a favorable tender, marking, etc. in favor of the Defendant A after obtaining the relevant documents, such as the certificate of qualification for the head of the child care center necessary for the tender, and delivered it to the Defendant, which is the head of the above apartment management office of the apartment complex (a non-detained prosecution due to interference with bidding on March 16, 2015), and made and submitted a public notice of the selection of a tender, and also prepared and submitted a tender document for T participating in the bidding in the form of a formal bid. The above apartment care center operator's public tender of the apartment, upon receiving the right of operation of Defendant A through a formal bid as planned and planned in advance, was awarded KRW 1.5 million from the Defendant A to receive KRW 15 million from the public tender of the above apartment care center operator, and offered and received money and valuables in return for the bid.

1. The Defendants’ interference with the bidding of the Defendants pursuant to the aforementioned conspiracys with P, N, Q, R, and S, P shall deliver the notice of the tender to the children’s house manager of the above apartment complex to S, who is the head of the apartment management office, and the list of the assessment to the occupants’ representative.