However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

After the Defendant became aware of the so-called “work loan” business operator who received a loan from a financial institution by forging documents, etc. through online site search, the Defendant conspiredd with C, D, and E, the above business operator, and the Defendant, even though the Defendant did not have concluded a lease contract on the apartment owned by F, concluded the lease contract on the above apartment and paid the lease deposit to the financial institution by forging the lease deposit contract on the apartment, etc. as if the Defendant had concluded the lease contract on the apartment owned by F

1. On August 20, 2012, the Defendant: (a) conspired with C, D, E, etc., and at the H Licensed Real Estate Agent’s Office located under 100-110 commercial buildings located in Suwon-si G Apartment-gu, Suwon-si; (b) the Defendant took place as if he was a lessee; and (c) the said D, as if he was a lessor, took place as if he was a lessor, was acting in the column for indicating the real estate subject to the apartment lease contract; (c) “Seoul-do Suwon-si, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, I Apartment 701, 601, 601, and 601, in the column for the lessor’s address; (d) stated “K” and the phone number column as “F”; and (e) affixed the seal of F, who was aware of in advance of the name and side of F.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, etc., forged one copy of the apartment lease contract in F, a private document on rights and obligations.

2. On August 21, 2012, the Defendant: (a) in collusion with C, D, E, etc., filed an application for a loan to the employee in charge of the loan that he/she knew of the forgery; (b) submitted the forged apartment lease contract to the said employee as if it was duly formed.

3. The Defendant, in collusion with C, D, E, etc., submitted a forged apartment lease agreement with the employee in charge of the above bank at the time and place of the above “paragraph 2,” and the Defendant paid KRW 170,000 to the building owner for the deposit money and transferred to him.