On June 2010, 2010, the Defendant: (a) held that the Defendant was a driver of the G market located in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (H) on the early June 1, 2010, and that the Defendant would work as a driver of the G market located in Eunpyeong-gu, Seoul, and that the Defendant would work as a driver of the H (H); (b) provided that the Victim F would have an influence on the company by entering the election of the head of the H (H) labor union; and (c) provided that the Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s Defendant’s wife E who would work as the bus company, or demand two financial guarantees for employment; and (d) provided that F would have influence on the company as a person who fell away from one lane in the election of the head of the labor union; and (c) provided that the Defendant would also have a restaurant operation right.

B. On June 19, 2010, the Defendant of defamation: (a) around June 19, 2010, at the same place as above, there was a general secretary L/C in charge of H(State) trade union L/C and driver I; (b) the Defendant, including the fact that the victim F said, had not borrowed five million won, allowed E to purchase the vehicle, or allowed E to purchase the vehicle, or allowed E to do so for 2,3 days, even though he did not intend to do so; (c) the Defendant, etc., “F, etc., as a person who fell short of one lane in the election for the head of the Trade Union and Labor Relations Association, had influence on the company; and (d) said L, etc., would have been employed in H(State).

In this regard, 2 persons who are financial guarantee are called up.

E is expected to be employed, and 5 million won was lent to E, and the vehicle for commuting was called to E, and it was sent to E for 2,3 days.