2. According to the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, the following circumstances are acknowledged.

(1) As to the details and details of the indecent act, the victim made a consistent and clear statement in the court below’s decision to the effect that “the defendant must continue to walk the horses, and caused the part in hand while walking the bridge,” and that “the bridge part was closed while walking the bridge,” is credibility.

(2) At the time, the Defendant, who was seated in a bus at the time, saw the victim immediately on the front side of the bus into a face, and sees that he was able to take the body in depth toward the lower body of the victim, and then sees that he was able to take the body toward the lower body of the victim, and then sees that she was able to take the body in depth. It does not seem that she was able to see that she was able to take the body by using a hand.

(3) At the court below, witness E, who was on board the same bus at the time, stated in the court below that “at the time, the defendant was fluencing to the body of any woman who was under the influence of alcohol and went back to the future, and was going back again, and due to such an act, the female continued to appear in the front of the defendant, thereby moving or getting down the defendant into the damaged area. While the victim continued in the front of the defendant, the victim was able to take her hand over several times, and the victim was able to have her her body near the bridge and the her body near the bridge.” In other words, he stated that “The victim was under the influence of the victim.”