However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On January 25, 2015, at the front of Seodaemun-gu Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul around 23:40, the Defendant got home from a slope D belonging to the Seoul Western Police Station C District, which was called out after receiving a report of 112, and continued to assault the above D’s bucks from the criminal police station and office located in the Seoul Seodaemun-gu, Seoul Western Police Station on several occasions due to the end of the depression brought by the Defendant.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers on the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Code of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] The basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the execution of official duties) (the execution of official duties) is nonexistent [decision of sentence] The defendant needs to be strictly punished in that police officers interfere with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties by abusing violence. However, the defendant's mistake is recognized and divided, there is no record of criminal punishment exceeding a fine, and other various conditions of punishment shown in the argument of this case such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, etc.