Of the facts charged in the instant case, July 13, 2015 and July 15, 2015 and July 17, 2015.

On July 23, 2015, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim E by using the “D” from the Defendant’s smartphones room room with 30 members of the group Kakakao Stockholm Group with the Defendant’s smartphones at the Defendant’s residence located in Sinpo City B, 204 502.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of police statement protocol to E;

1. Article 311 of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense and Article 311 of the choice of punishment;

1. Penalty fine of 200,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act of the Suspension of Pronouncement of Sentence (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act, although the defendant partially denies the criminal facts, it is the primary criminal of the defendant and has yet to be aged, circumstances leading to the criminal facts

1. On July 13, 2015, the Defendant posted the facts charged on the part of the Defendant, at the Defendant’s residence located in Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, the Defendant, using the Defendant’s smartphone to “C” with 30 members of “D”, “F (victim)” for the victim E using “F (victim)” from the Kakao-si’s group movie room with 30 members of “D”. On July 15, 2015, the Defendant posted the Defendant “F (victim)” to “F (F)” for the victim on the 15th of the same month.

Around the 17th day of the same month, the victim publicly insultingd the victim, by posting the victim “Franchis,” “I do not have to go to go to F, but rather, I do not go to go to F,” and on the same day, posted the victim “I do not go to go to F, I do not have to go to go to F.”

2. The offense of insult under Article 311 of the Criminal Act is outside the meaning of social evaluation of the value of a person.