beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 김천지원 2013.12.24 2011고단1202

폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동주거침입)

Text

[Defendant A, B, C, D, E, F, H, and I] Defendant A, D, H, and C shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, Defendant B, F, and I for eight months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 22, 2011, Defendant A was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.) in the Daegu District Court Kimcheon Branch on June 22, 201; two years; Defendant C was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.); four years; Defendant D was sentenced to suspension of execution for a period of two years; Defendant D was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (a collective weapon, etc.); three years of suspension of execution for a period of one year and six months; Defendant H was sentenced to suspension of execution for a period of one year and six months; Defendant C was sentenced to suspension of execution for a period of three years on June 14, 201; Defendant I was sentenced to suspension of execution for a period of three years on June 22, 2012; and Defendant I was sentenced to suspension of execution for a period of one year and six years from Seoul Southern District Court.

Defendant A’s position is the head of metal labor union M subdivision, Defendant B’s chief site director of metal labor union N division, Defendant C is the head of metal labor union M subdivision, Defendant D is the chief site director of metal labor union M subdivision, Defendant E and F are the head of metal labor union M subdivision, Defendant E and F are the head of metal labor union M subdivision site, Defendant G is the external cooperation director of metal labor union MM subdivision, Defendant H is the head of metal labor union MM subdivision, Defendant H is the head of metal labor union O.

I. In order to eliminate the wage payment limitation system for paid union members, Defendant A, B, E, Defendants P, Q, R, and S conspired with the negotiations with (ju)M during a strike from June 9, 2010, with the aim of achieving the elimination of the wage payment limitation system for paid union members, in collaboration with (100) union members belonging to the metal labor union and 100 union members belonging to the metal labor union and on September 1, 2010.

1. The Defendants who interfere with the business of August 31, 2010 are P, Q, R, S, and metal labor.