When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B car cars.

1. On July 9, 2014, at around 00:15, the Defendant driven the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 500 meters at approximately 0.109 percent of alcohol content in front of the cafeteria located in the north-gu, Seogu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, in front of the cafeteria located in the north-gu, Seo-gu.

2. The Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents”) led, on the same driving as the above one, to drive approximately 50 kilometers in speed along two lanes in the direction of the ozone distance from the direction of the Yonono to the direction of the Yonando.

Since there is an intersection where signal, etc. is operated, a person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to reduce speed and drive safely in accordance with the signals by living well the right and the right of the road.

In addition, due to the negligence of violating the signal, the victim C(43 years old) driven by the victim C(43 years old) who is to turn to the left from the new direction in the direction of the wind distance from the Seongbuk intersection, the front portion of the Done Star Cargo in front of the left part of the vehicle of the defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered from the victim C’s injury, such as the mouths of the bones of uniforms and bones for about five weeks during the treatment period, to the victim E (the age of 55) of the damaged vehicle, which requires approximately two weeks of treatment due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on detection of a host driver;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of sound driving), Article 3 (1), the proviso of Article 3 (2) 1, Article 3 (2) 8 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Aggravation for concurrent crimes;