A. Determination as to the claim for remuneration (1) The Plaintiff sought payment of KRW 35,00,000 for unpaid remuneration from the Defendant. (2) According to the respective descriptions of Evidence Nos. 1, 7 through 11 (including paper numbers), the Plaintiff, from February 1, 2007, worked as the representative director of the Defendant (which is a company before and after the change; hereinafter referred to as “Defendant”) who is engaged in the business of selling the collecting pumps, etc., and was retired from office on August 14, 2018; the sum of remuneration paid by the Plaintiff from the Defendant in 2018 exceeds KRW 45,164,520; the Defendant entered into an agreement on KRW 30,000 on the remaining e-mail within 0,000,000,000 for 30,000 won and 30,000,000 won and 30,000,000 won and 30,000,00 won.

3) According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant may recognize the fact that at least 35,00,000 won has not been paid out of the remuneration that the Plaintiff shall pay to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant is obligated to pay the Plaintiff the amount of KRW 35,00,000 and damages for delay thereof. 4) As to this, the Defendant disputes that the Plaintiff was not working in the Defendant from March 2018, and that there was no fact that the Defendant requested the payment of remuneration, and thus, it cannot be paid. However, the Defendant’s evidence No. 5, consistent with the above argument, is presented