성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Defendants shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won each.
The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.
Punishment of the crime
Before separation, the co-defendant C (hereinafter referred to as "defendants") employed Da, etc., a female sexual traffic with the nationality of Thailand, recruited the male sexual traffic by using smartphone app "E", etc. in the Gyeongsan city, and decided to take charge of the role of arranging sexual traffic by taking charge of the commercial sex trade, under the direction of Defendant C, Defendant A, and Defendant B, upon receiving the direction of Defendant C, to take the commercial sex trade to the place of commercial sex trade, and take charge of the role of taking it back again after the completion of commercial sex trade.
Defendant
C The same year from March 2016
5. From November 1, 201 to April 16, 2016, Defendant A and Defendant B were the same year.
5. Until November 1, 200, at the Gansan-si, a notice of a letter related to sexual traffic using the above "E", etc., and setting out a promise with the men reporting and communicating the above letter, and then receiving an amount equivalent to 150,000 won in return for sexual traffic, and allowing the said women to engage in sexual traffic.
As a result, the Defendants conspired to arrange sexual traffic for business purposes as above.
Summary of Evidence
1. The legal statement of the defendant A and C
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against Defendant C, D, or F;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to Defendant A Handphone photographs
1. Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 30 of the Criminal Act, and selection of fines;
1. Consideration of the fact that the Defendants, on the grounds of sentencing under Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act, did not have any history of criminal punishment; the period involved in the crime is shorter; Defendant C was employed by Defendant C to move sexual traffic women to vehicles; and there was no benefit acquired from the crime above.