On August 12, 2017, at around 19:50 on August 12, 2017, the Defendants discovered that, in front of the Mapo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government D D Building (E), the victims F of Japanese nationality, a member of the son group, and the victims G, waiting for the number of the above groups on the floor, and committed money and valuables at the expense of the victims.

Defendant

B There is a lot of comments to the victims, inducing the victims to follow the H building, inducing the victims to take out KRW 220,000 in cash, which the victims used in the gap between Defendant B and Defendant B, and continued to take out KRW 20,000 in cash, which had been in the family room of the victims G, by taking advantage of the gap between Defendant B and Defendant B.

They go back.

Accordingly, the Defendants, together, stolen the total amount of KRW 420,000 owned by the victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. Investigation report (the application of CCTV investigations into H building Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Defendants of the relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts: Articles 331(2) and 331(1) of the Criminal Act

1. Small-scale mitigated Defendants: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants to be suspended from sentence: Six months of imprisonment; and

1. The Defendants of suspended sentence: Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59(1)3 of the Criminal Act provides that the Defendants reflects the instant crime in depth and are deemed to have committed the instant crime in contingent terms; the amount that the Defendants stolen is relatively small; the Defendants’ death and recovery of damage was caused by the victims; the Defendants did not have any history of criminal punishment; and other conditions of sentencing stipulated under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, such as the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive for committing the instant crime