2. The judgment appears to have recognized the defendant's mistake and against himself; the defendant agreed with the victim that the damage was recovered; however, the defendant was suspended from execution due to a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (at night) in 2003; the defendant was punished for the same kind of crime in 2006; the defendant was subject to punishment for the crime of injury in 2007; and the defendant, upon receiving the victim's report, expressed a great voice to the police officer dispatched, etc.; the circumstances after the crime are bad; and the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the circumstances and result of the crime in this case; and the circumstances after the crime in this case, etc., the defendant's punishment of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 346 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.