2. It is recognized that the defendant can have been tried together with the crime of acquiring stolens for which judgment became final and conclusive while making a confession.

However, it is not determined that the lower court’s punishment is excessively unreasonable in view of the following: (a) the fact that the stolens acquired by the Defendant are not many; (b) the injury has not been recovered until the trial is the case; and (c) the character and conduct of the Defendant; and (d) the motive, means and methods of

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.