However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. The Defendant, at around 19:10 on December 17, 2018, expressed the victim’s attitude of causing harm to the life or body of the victim, including the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife 150,00 won on the ground that the victim’s knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knif kn

2. On December 17, 2018, the Defendant interfered with the business, from around 19:58 to 20:47, obstructed the Defendant’s operation of the restaurant at the above restaurant; the knife the knife knife knife knife knife knife knife knife k

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Each photograph (Nos. 5, 10 of the evidence list);

1. Application of each CD-related statute

1. Articles 284, 283(1) and 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc. of Social Service Orders;

1. As a result of the imposition of sentence under Article 48 (1) 1 of the Confiscation Criminal Act, Article 48 (1) 1 of the same Act provides that the defendant is guilty of his/her fault, and the defendant is punished by a fine, even though he/she has the same criminal conviction, he/she has the same criminal conviction in June to June.