The Plaintiff as the parties is a person who was subject to dumping on the right side from the medical personnel affiliated with the Defendant Chungcheongnamnam University Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”), which is a medical corporation on December 8, 2009.

The plaintiff was subject to rehabilitation treatment by traffic accident around 2007. The plaintiff was under rehabilitation treatment due to paralysis, etc.

On November 19, 2009, the Plaintiff was under health examination at the Daejeon P Hospital located in Daejeon Peong-gu, Daejeon (Se X-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-W-S)

As a result of the scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopics

On the other hand, as a result of the judgment reading the above chest CT by the Defendant hospital’s respiratory machine and the medical team, there was approximately 3.1cm mphere at the upper part of the eupulmonary leaves (hereinafter “the head of this case”) and it was found that the head of the euthane in the inside of the euthane and the head of the euthane is connected with the chest.

Accordingly, it is judged that it is necessary to conduct a more accurate examination and to conduct an immediate treatment (over-the-counter control) in accordance with the result of the recovery of a large number of the biological body of the head of the defendant hospital by strongly suspected that the head of the defendant hospital and the head of the plaintiff body affiliated with the defendant hospital are malicious, and that the head of the plaintiff department D requested the organization examination and removal of the head of the ring in the chest outside of the defendant hospital on November 25, 2009.

On December 8, 2009, the Plaintiff received an operation from E, F, and G to test and remove the tissue of the instant heading (hereinafter “instant operation”).

After the commencement of the operation, the above doctors were 4 lupages at the right 4 lupage under the Plaintiff’s general anesthesia and 5.