However, each of the above penalties shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendants are the people of the NAN.

피고인들은 2017. 12. 31. 05:30 경 부산 남구 C에 있는 ‘D’ 편의점 야외 테이블에서 술을 마시다가 맞은편 테이블에서 술을 마시고 있던 피해자 E(24 세) 및 피해자 F(24 세) 과 눈이 마주친 일로 시비가 되어 몸싸움을 하던 중 피고인 A은 피해자 E의 얼굴 부위를 주먹으로 1회 때려 피해자 E을 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 피해자 E의 얼굴과 머리 부위를 발로 수회 차고, 피고인 B는 옆에 있던 피해자 F의 얼굴 부위를 주먹으로 1회 때려 피해자 F을 바닥에 넘어뜨린 후 피해자 F의 얼굴과 머리 부위를 발로 수회 찼다.

계속해서 피고인들은 넘어진 피해자들의 얼굴과 머리 부위를 번갈아 발로 수회 찼다.

As such, the Defendants jointly committed the injury to the victims E, and each of the victims F, such as the care for about 8 weeks of treatment, the care for the victim E, and the care for the left-hand eye, the care for the victim F for about 3 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the occurrence of an investigation, a report on investigation (Attachment of cards used by on-site photographs and suspects at convenience stores), internal investigation reports (a counter investigation of the emergency room of the G hospital, and accompanying pictures of victims), field file reports, investigation reports (a photograph and attachment of CD pictures of the criminal scene A and B), investigation reports (a photograph of the video of the criminal scene of the suspect A and B, and attachment of documentary diagnosis of the victim E and F);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of joint injury) and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the same Act for the increase of concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution (the following sentencing shall be considered in light of the favorable circumstances in mind):

1. The instant case’s reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order.