2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

A. Plaintiff B is the spouse of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are children of Plaintiff A.

The Defendant Company is a corporation, the main business of which is hotel business and sea water bath business, and operates a mutual bath (hereinafter “F bath”).

B. On June 3, 2017, at around 13:00, Plaintiff A entered the instant bath, and received the arms and the bridge on the bridges, and then used the air conditioning and the water brine (the place where the Plaintiff was provided with a strong water thrower coming from the ceiling).

C. After that, the plaintiff A was diagnosed as having a serious pain on the Heluri part of the instant bath, she applied to the Huluri part of the instant bath and Ilwon, and was treated as Huluri part of the instant bath, but the symptoms were not improved, and as a result, the plaintiff A taken X-ray photographs by visiting the G Hospital emergency room on the day of the instant day after she was found to have been diagnosed as having been diagnosed as “the structural closure of the pele part of the verte L5 part of the spine L5 part of the instant bath, the pelle part of the lower and the pelle part of the pelle part of the pel

Plaintiff

On June 5, 2017, A was diagnosed as radioactive rays, CT, and MRI’s inspection results as “the pressure pressures No. 5 in the Trist and 5 in the Trist and the left-hand clicks (hereinafter “the instant injury”)” (hereinafter “the instant injury”). On June 8, 2017, A was diagnosed as radioactive rays, CT, and MRI’s test.”

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 11, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Judgment on the plaintiffs' assertion

A. The plaintiffs' assertion that the defendant neglected the duty to frequently check and manage the electric bath in this case's bath while neglecting the duty to manage it safely. Since the plaintiff Gap suffered the bodily injury in this case due to the excessive current from the electric he contracted out of the electric heat on the day of this case, the defendant 116,287,326 won and the plaintiff Eul as property damage and consolation money, the defendant 3,000,000 won as consolation money, and 3,000 won as property damage and consolation money to Gap.