2.Provided, That the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

The Defendant is a person who operates a manufacturing company in Pyeongtaek-si B with the trade name "C", and no person is allowed to employ a foreign worker who does not have the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities. However, the Defendant from May 15, 2013 to the same year.

6. up to 14. By the time of 14., six foreign workers who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at the above workplace, including employment of an unborn worker D, who did not have the status of sojourn eligible for job-seeking activities at that time, such as the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each written statement of foreign workers;

1. Application of accusation books, certificates of foreign employment, business registration certificates, and statutes;

1. Article 94 Subparag. 9 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 18 (3) of the same Act, the choice of applicable laws and punishment concerning facts constituting an offense, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;