beta
(영문) 대전고등법원 2018.11.01 2018누10994

부당해고구제재심판정취소

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are all included in the part resulting from participation.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance as to this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition and deletion as follows. Thus, it shall be cited as it is in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 3 8 (hereinafter referred to as “instant dismissal”) shall be deleted.

No. 3, 10, 100, hereinafter “instant dismissal disposition”).

(i) was friendly as ";"

All of the "Defendants" in Chapter 3 through 14 are referred to as the "National Labor Relations Commission".

The 7th page 2's dismissal procedure against the plaintiff shall be "the dismissal procedure for the plaintiff".

Part 10, Part 5, Paragraph 5, the following is added:

“The Plaintiff asserts to the effect that it is unreasonable to consider the ratio of female workers among female workers belonging to the Defendant Intervenor in determining a disciplinary action. However, considering the circumstances of the workplace or the impact on the corporate order in the disciplinary action, it is extremely unreasonable to consider the circumstances of the workplace and the Plaintiff’s wrongful act of sexual harassment against female workers, it is unreasonable to consider the ratio of female workers belonging to the Defendant Intervenor in determining whether the instant dismissal disposition clearly loses validity under the generally accepted social norms.

(1)Nos. 10 and 16 of the Act are the following additions:

"The plaintiff (the plaintiff) found the victim's workplace and the house of the victim who refused to prepare a written application for coal and demanded the preparation of a written application for coal.

) Part 12 of the 12th page “Defendant” is close to the Central Labor Relations Commission.

2. If so, the judgment of the court of first instance is legitimate. Thus, the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.