However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 17:20 on August 31, 2014, the Defendant: (a) received 112 report from a police officer E belonging to the original police station D District called the police officer, who was dispatched to the site after receiving a notification of violation of the Punishment of Minor Offenses Act, and (b) expressed the desire to “the police officer this dog, police officer’s spawn, and spawn with spawn with spawn with spawn with spawn with spawn; (c) assaulted the E’s clothes in his hand when he takes care of spawn with E, etc. on his hand, and interfere with the police officer’s legitimate execution of duties concerning handling 112 reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that there is no criminal conviction for the defendant, and there is no criminal conviction exceeding the fine after 1980) or more;