When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant, around January 18, 2017, sold a mobile phone type displayer to the victim B who became aware of the fact from the cross-explosive telecom located in the Geumjin-gu Seoul Metropolitan City through the U.S.-dong from the U.S.-dong.

In other words, 40,000 won was remitted in the name of the Agricultural Cooperative (Account Number: D) account in the name of the commodity price.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the above goods to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the above 40,000 won.

The Defendant, around January 18, 2017, sold buphone flus to the injured party B who became aware of through the Facebook North Korea at the bufel.

In other words, 35,000 won was remitted as part of the price of goods to the above account.

However, the defendant did not have the intention or ability to sell the above goods to the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim and defrauds the above 35,00 won.

Summary of Evidence

Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police report on the investigation report of the police statement to the defendant in the police interrogation protocol (related to the submission of the victim e-mail

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 347 of the same Act concerning the crime, the selection of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. All circumstances were taken into account, such as: (a) the Defendant’s ground for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, upon receiving a claim for recovery of the right to claim a formal trial; and (b) the Defendant did not appear in the trial even after receiving a decision of acceptance.