2. Examining the various sentencing factors shown in the records and pleadings, such as the fact that the blood alcohol concentration in the judgment is relatively high, and that the defendant was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol or refusing to measure under the influence of alcohol, etc., the judgment of the court below is not deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion, but there is no change in special circumstances that could change the sentence of the court below after the court below was sentenced.

(C) If the Defendant loses his status as a public official in contractual service, and the Defendant’s economic situation is difficult, various circumstances asserted in this court are considered to have already been considered in determining punishment in the original instance. The Defendant’s assertion of unreasonable sentencing is without merit.

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.