2. In light of the following factors: (a) there are some extenuating circumstances to consider the Defendant’s commission of the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s economic benefits from each of the instant crimes cannot be deemed to be significant; (c) the Defendant recovered from damage to the victim I,O, and K; (d) however, the number of offenses was extremely high; (b) the commission of the instant crime was committed more than five times, more than six times, more than six times, and more; (c) the nature of the instant crime was defective; (d) the Defendant was not making efforts to recover damage up to the trial; (d) the Defendant was punished several offenses; and (e) the Defendant was punished several times, in particular, by a fine of larceny in 2015, more than four times.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit.