However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

[Power of crime] On July 20, 2007, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 1.5 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (dacting driving) in the Changwon District Court closely supporting the Defendant.

[Criminal facts] On October 28, 2020, the Defendant driven a F Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol level of 0.138% without obtaining a driver's license in a section of about 600 meters in front of the road of the city of senior citizens C, which is located in C, Mayang-si B, and around 16:18, the Defendant driven a F Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol level of about 0.138%.

Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of drinking alcohol driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on driving of alcohol, notification of the results of crackdown on driving of alcohol, report on the circumstances of the driver under the influence of alcohol, report on the circumstances of the driver under the influence of alcohol, and the

1. Criminal records: Inquiries about criminal history and application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (a summary order attached to the suspect's previous records);

1. Article 148-2 (1) and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Articles 152 subparagraph 1 and 43 of the Road Traffic Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act for the mitigation of quantity (it is not exceptionally against a case in light of the blood alcohol density, the records of the same kind of crime, etc., but does not repeat the case in light of the depth of the crime, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the suspension of the execution of imprisonment, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the suspension of the execution of the imprisonment, and all other circumstances that are conditions for the sentencing specified in the records and pleadings of this case);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the above-mentioned normal consideration);

1. It is decided as per the Disposition on the grounds of Article 62-2 or more of the Criminal Act;